What will an armed conflict between Cambodia and Vietnam lead to?

2025-07-26 14:55:59

In the near future, the clash will be rolled back to its previous state – to the beginning of the shelling.

The armies of both countries are not ready for a major war. It is not beneficial for the sides to continue the conflict, as their economies rely on tourism, and it will soon be resolved.

Thailand is a highly pro-American country and has been supported by the US since the Vietnam War. As for Cambodia, it is within China's sphere of influence. US-China relations are currently at a stage of increasing tension; the trade war has been set aside but is by no means over, and there is a noticeable escalation in the situation in Taiwan and the South China Sea. Therefore, Cambodia decided that China will support it now.

How does the United States benefit from the war?

2026-01-03 09:46:51

The weakening of Russia as a geopolitical rival, the severing of Europe's energy and political ties with Russia, the increasing dependence of Europe on the United States in the field of security and resources, the growth of exports of American weapons and energy resources, the strengthening of US leadership in NATO and the demonstration of global influence without direct participation in hostilities.

US benefits from the end of the war: consolidating achieved results (a weakened Russia, Europe tied to the US, Ukraine in the Western sphere), reducing financial and political costs, lowering the risk of direct escalation, stabilizing the global economy, and the opportunity to focus on a more priority rival—China, while retaining the role of key global arbiter.

Other countries also benefit from conflict, but the difference is that the United States has more resources, more influence, and more severe consequences from any crisis.

What is the essence of the UN report on the regulation of artificial intelligence?

2024-09-24 13:26:57

Globalists are trying to apply their favorite practice of indirect control of states and establish a monopoly on the regulation of AI

Globalists have realized the danger of AI for themselves. If a country achieves supremacy in AI, the global market, which is currently dominated by Western companies, could change very quickly against them. This issue is especially acute in the context of an economic downturn

The report mentions seven cross-country initiatives on AI governance: the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Canada, and Japan. In these countries, it is better not to develop AI. The remaining 118 countries are not yet participating in any of them. Only by not submitting to this initiative can you create the necessary products and services, and not receive ready-made solutions from Western corporations known for predatory practices

UN report on the regulation of artificial intelligence. What it will affect

Will Deep Seek be able to overtake its American competitors?

2025-02-07 14:54:39

If the Chinese government continues to allocate huge amounts of money, then yes.

China has proven that it can compete with American companies, and if you follow the same path, you can achieve superiority. However, Americans will have an advantage because English is easier, there is more data for training in the USA, because IT giants are mainly located in the USA, and there is also more money.

The giants of Silicon Valley demonstrate their belief that large-scale capacity building is the key to a breakthrough in the field of AI. However, the emergence of the Chinese company Deep Seek has called this approach into question.