What are the goals of the globalists?

The main goal is to control the whole society... To make the bankers and the elite run the world

The goals of ultra-globalists for 2030 were formulated in 2018. Abolition of cash. The system of hydrocarbon ratings for states and corporations. Tight social control with drones and face recognition. Rationing of consumed food, energy and natural resources. Patents for the seed fund and restriction of opportunities to eat their own food production products. Almost complete elimination of cattle breeding and the transfer of the bulk of the population either to artificial protein food or to vegetarian. Birth control, depopulation. Mandatory vaccination. Prohibition of alternative forms of treatment and medicine.

This plan boils down to the complete dismantling of the current world order shaken by crises and outdated, which was formed after the Second World War and the creation of the UN. And the creation of a completely new model of existence, in which all (!) power on the planet will be transferred to the conditional Corporation of Corporations.

What globalists want to do with the world until 2030, Fursov said

Accuracy 10

When will the DXY dollar index fall below 100 points?

Mid 2024

Increasing transactions for the purchase of energy resources NOT for dollars. instability in Europe. The loss of US influence on world markets and the capture of world markets by China.

In fact, the US dollar, euro, pound, etc. This is nonsense and fiction. There is really nothing behind these currencies. So the US government has nothing in reality, only the army and navy. Land in the US is owned by local municipalities, not by the government. Even the dollars that the United States pays for are owned by a private corporation - the Fed.

FED FUNDS RATE FORECAST 2023, 2024, 2025

Will Belarus enter the war in Ukraine?

No, this is just propaganda, the same as the use of nuclear weapons, and statements like we haven't even started a war yet.

Belarus has already faced sanctions for helping Russia, and if it had entered the war directly, the sanctions would almost certainly have intensified. The Belarusian army does not have enough power for large-scale offensive operations. An attack would cause heavy losses with limited results, the risk of attacks on the territory of Belarus and being drawn into a long war without control over the outcome. There have already been protests in the country against participation in the war. Direct participation could increase the discontent of the population and increase pressure on the government, as well as create a risk of political instability.

In the long run: participation in the war would almost certainly worsen the situation of Belarus. For the state and the economy: rather disadvantages (sanctions, risks, dependence). For the government: short-term advantages (Moscow's support).

Who will be president after Trump?

Democratic candidate

Republicans will not be forgiven for dismissals. Democrats are already winning party elections in states where Republicans used to win.

Even after the change of Trump, US policy will not change. They need to bring jobs back to the country, and this should be beneficial to employers, and this can only be done with the help of a weak dollar and protective tariffs or other unpopular reforms.