The destruction of the family institution is extremely desirable for those states that gravitate towards totalitarianism (even behind the facade of democracy), since it is impossible to establish complete control over a person without educating him from the very action, with the necessary concepts and attitudes put into his head.
The influence of the state and the political elite, as well as other influential groups, on society is very limited, since each member of society is the bearer of a certain understanding of what is good and bad, how to act right and wrong. And if the attitudes that come from the elites are strikingly different from the understanding of society in a particular issue, then such attitudes will stumble upon strong opposition from the people and for the most part will not be accepted. The only way to carry out any of your decisions without causing public resistance is to learn how to manage public opinion and the norms that are accepted in society. To be able to control a person from his most basic level, it is necessary to control his upbringing from childhood.

The destruction of the family institution is extremely detrimental to the survival of society. Having erased his memory due to the destruction of the mechanism of its transmission from parent to child, society will lose those habits and knowledge that are sometimes not even visible and obvious, but constantly protect society from serious mistakes, which at best can greatly worsen its situation, and in the worst is to put it on the brink of extinction.
The destruction of the family institution: causes and consequences
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
The state has no scientific tasks.
When a country is engaged in the sale of hydrocarbons, why do we need extra mouths in the form of scientists, if the money is already flowing.

Science is expensive, but near-science brings noticeably more money.
Why does no one need scientists in Russia?
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
There are many goals: from creating a monopoly and capturing market share to destroying competitors. They understand that if their system dominates, they will have money, influence, employees who do not need to be trained, and the ability to destroy or slow down competitors. Even sabotage: it takes time to study the system, and when a person realizes that he studied an outdated framework in vain, time is wasted. If they don't act, they will find themselves in this position.
There are many goals: from creating a monopoly and capturing market share to destroying competitors. They understand that if their system dominates, they will have money, influence, employees who do not need to be trained, and the ability to destroy or slow down competitors. Even sabotage: it takes time to study the system, and when a person realizes that he studied an outdated framework in vain, time is wasted. If they don't act, they will find themselves in this position.

You can train neural networks without a framework, as well as accelerate learning.
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Although WHO's official mandate is to achieve the highest attainable standard of health for all peoples, serious researchers and scholars note that often under the guise of a health organization, it is actively engaged in political, legal and human rights activities, promoting the interests of large pharmaceutical companies and financial institutions.
To declare a pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) changed its definition. If earlier, in order to declare a pandemic, a large number of people had to die, now the WHO considers a disease that has spread throughout the world to be a pandemic. The organization sowed panic by greatly exaggerating the scale of the danger. Her decisions were influenced by experts with financial interests with large pharmaceutical companies that earned billions of dollars to fight the pandemic.

Since 2005, an amendment has been introduced that allows this public organization in emergency situations (for example, during pandemics) to issue orders that are mandatory for execution by all countries. Previously, WHO could only make recommendations to the international community.
Project Pandemic? Signs of a Possible Global Scam
Why did the WHO change the concept of a pandemic?
What is WHO and why does it need pandemics?
Why the WHO is fanning the pandemic and frightening the world's population
Why WHO and its partners need a pandemic
COVID-19 PANDEMIC - A PROJECT OF WHO AND THE WORLD BANK
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device