Why destroy the institution of the family?

2023-04-10 11:20:37

The destruction of the family institution is extremely desirable for those states that gravitate towards totalitarianism (even behind the facade of democracy), since it is impossible to establish complete control over a person without educating him from the very action, with the necessary concepts and attitudes put into his head.

The influence of the state and the political elite, as well as other influential groups, on society is very limited, since each member of society is the bearer of a certain understanding of what is good and bad, how to act right and wrong. And if the attitudes that come from the elites are strikingly different from the understanding of society in a particular issue, then such attitudes will stumble upon strong opposition from the people and for the most part will not be accepted. The only way to carry out any of your decisions without causing public resistance is to learn how to manage public opinion and the norms that are accepted in society. To be able to control a person from his most basic level, it is necessary to control his upbringing from childhood.

The destruction of the family institution is extremely detrimental to the survival of society. Having erased his memory due to the destruction of the mechanism of its transmission from parent to child, society will lose those habits and knowledge that are sometimes not even visible and obvious, but constantly protect society from serious mistakes, which at best can greatly worsen its situation, and in the worst is to put it on the brink of extinction.

The destruction of the family institution: causes and consequences

What is commitet 300?

2023-08-04 07:47:29

The Committee of 300 is a secret society consisting of representatives of the inviolable ruling class, which includes the Queen of England, the royal families of Europe, famous politicians – Chamberlain, Winston Churchill, George Lloyd, George Bush, as well as the richest families in the world, such as the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, Fords, etc. (more than 300 families in total).

The global predictor controls the world economy through loans and bond loans (IMF), creates economic crises (for example, the Great Depression), unleashes wars (including world wars), plants various subcultures (hippies, beatniks, etc.) and manages international drug trafficking (the UK's fortune is made on the opium trade).

It reminds me of those creepy and deliberately chilling monster movies where a monster with distorted facial features, long hair and even longer teeth growls and spits in all directions. These films only distract attention, real monsters wear business suits and come to work on Capitol Hill in limousines.

Committee of 300 - Secret World Government

What happens if we start regulating AI?

2026-01-02 14:45:25

The Americans are the leaders in AI, and regulation will only increase the technological gap of other countries.

Inequality between countries will lead to the fact that regions with strict regulation may lag behind less regulated ones. This could lead to a war of humans against robots, like in science fiction movies. Governments are trying to regulate AI, relying on experts, business and academia, but the balance of power is unequal: corporations have more resources and influence, independent specialists have less voice. As a result, the rules often reflect not the public interest, but the interests of the strongest players.

The spread of AI is already regulated by American companies that control all key aspects of AI. Video cards, processors, major data centers, scientific developments, etc. are controlled by the Americans.

What are the true goals of the green protests?

2023-03-09 13:16:26

The goal remains the same: halting the progress of developing countries

Rich countries can afford to abandon economic growth, for developing countries everything looks different: this is their only chance to overcome poverty. Ambitious climate goals, as set by green activists, make this task virtually impossible.

All shares are sponsored through funds by the richest people on the planet

Kennedy and rockefeller: do they finance the green protests in Europe?

Accuracy 10