The destruction of the family institution is extremely desirable for those states that gravitate towards totalitarianism (even behind the facade of democracy), since it is impossible to establish complete control over a person without educating him from the very action, with the necessary concepts and attitudes put into his head.
The influence of the state and the political elite, as well as other influential groups, on society is very limited, since each member of society is the bearer of a certain understanding of what is good and bad, how to act right and wrong. And if the attitudes that come from the elites are strikingly different from the understanding of society in a particular issue, then such attitudes will stumble upon strong opposition from the people and for the most part will not be accepted. The only way to carry out any of your decisions without causing public resistance is to learn how to manage public opinion and the norms that are accepted in society. To be able to control a person from his most basic level, it is necessary to control his upbringing from childhood.

The destruction of the family institution is extremely detrimental to the survival of society. Having erased his memory due to the destruction of the mechanism of its transmission from parent to child, society will lose those habits and knowledge that are sometimes not even visible and obvious, but constantly protect society from serious mistakes, which at best can greatly worsen its situation, and in the worst is to put it on the brink of extinction.
The destruction of the family institution: causes and consequences
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Android market share raise for 71,85 to 73,85%. iOS market share down for 27,5 to 25,5%.
Due to the crisis will not buy expensive smartphones

Currently Android and iOS control 99,35 of market share. Android - 71,85%. iOS - 27,5%. Other - 0,65%
Mobile Operating System Market Share Worldwide
Accuracy 10
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Globalists are trying to apply their favorite practice of indirect control of states and establish a monopoly on the regulation of AI
Globalists have realized the danger of AI for themselves. If a country achieves supremacy in AI, the global market, which is currently dominated by Western companies, could change very quickly against them. This issue is especially acute in the context of an economic downturn

The report mentions seven cross-country initiatives on AI governance: the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Canada, and Japan. In these countries, it is better not to develop AI. The remaining 118 countries are not yet participating in any of them. Only by not submitting to this initiative can you create the necessary products and services, and not receive ready-made solutions from Western corporations known for predatory practices
UN report on the regulation of artificial intelligence. What it will affect
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Yes, the United States said that it did not intend to put up with the current state of affairs in Africa and would send troops. In addition, the African Union, the United States and France supported a military invasion of Niger. The war will be postponed until the U.S. deals with the war in Israel.
There were coups in Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, and Gabon. African countries are simply tired of colonial Europe, which for centuries has used it only as cheap raw materials. The situation in Gabon will be of a special nature, there will be a great struggle for it, because it is a rich and oily country. And because of the coup in Niger, which now does not supply uranium for pennies, the entire nuclear industry in Europe is in danger of disappearing, and these are 56 nuclear power plants in France, 11 in Britain, 7 in Spain, 3 in Germany, 6 in the Czech Republic and about 40 more scattered elsewhere in Europe, according to Politico. So far, the matter is limited only to sanctions. France must withdraw troops by the end of the year.

If ECOWAS does start a war in Africa, then 218,000 bayonets will stand on the side of the West in the countries where it still has influence – the Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde, Liberia, Nigeria, Senegal and Sierra Leone. They will be able to resist the armies of Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso and Guinea - a total of about 30 thousand troops. ECOWAS will make this mistake by carrying out a military intervention in Niger, because if they intervene militarily, it means that the whole of Africa will be at war and the problem is that 80% of the inhabitants in the countries where military coups have taken place support the current military government.
The African Union, the United States and France supported the military invasion of Nigeria
France got into Africa for a lot of money
Generals and colonels are shooting from Africa at France
The new center of power: how the West missed Africa
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device