No
In 1994, the USA, England, France, and Russia concluded an agreement to cease the production of fissile materials for nuclear weapons. China did not sign the agreement but committed to comply with it. Israel also did not sign the agreement but stopped producing nuclear weapons in 2004, retaining the right to resume production if necessary. India, Pakistan, and North Korea, of course, did not sign the agreement. This agreement is perpetual, and its provisions came into effect in 1997.

Plutonium-based nuclear weapons have a shelf life of 18 years. 1997 18 years = 2015. Also, striking military targets, rather than cities, is the priority of a nuclear attack.
WHY THE US ELITE IS NOT AFRAID OF A NUCLEAR WAR WITH RUSSIA. I'M TALKING ABOUT RUSSIA AND THE USA.
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Currently no
The yuan is not a freely convertible currency. It can only buy Chinese goods.

The PRC is the world leader in the production of most industrial goods. This is facilitated by the weak exchange rate of the yuan against the dollar. If the yuan becomes the world's reserve currency, it will strengthen against the dollar, which means that China's industry will lose its competitive advantages.
Can the yuan replace the dollar?
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
No, this is just propaganda, the same as the use of nuclear weapons, and statements like we haven't even started a war yet.
Belarus has already faced sanctions for helping Russia, and if it had entered the war directly, the sanctions would almost certainly have intensified. The Belarusian army does not have enough power for large-scale offensive operations. An attack would cause heavy losses with limited results, the risk of attacks on the territory of Belarus and being drawn into a long war without control over the outcome. There have already been protests in the country against participation in the war. Direct participation could increase the discontent of the population and increase pressure on the government, as well as create a risk of political instability.

In the long run: participation in the war would almost certainly worsen the situation of Belarus. For the state and the economy: rather disadvantages (sanctions, risks, dependence). For the government: short-term advantages (Moscow's support).
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
No, the state itself will have to solve the issue of migrants.
America will be busy with a war with Iran

Democrats will remember this in the elections
Biden has three options to quell the unrest in Texas
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Scan QR code to get a link to APK file