What is the point of America to interfere in the war in Ukraine?

They rearm and improve their weapons

The United States has been an empire since 1947. Empires past and present must wage war to ensure their own existence.

War is a very important and lucrative part of the US economy and politics.

Why does America fight so many wars?

Why does the US start wars around the world and claim victories without having won anywhere?

How will Russia respond to attacks with long-range Western weapons?

Russia will supply weapons to the enemies of the West

The President of Russia stated that if Ukraine is allowed to strike Russian territory with Western long-range weapons, Russia will respond in kind: it will supply its own long-range weapons to the forces that strike the countries that allowed the attacks. The Kremlin does not name specific countries.

Russia cannot directly attack Western countries because it would lead to World War III. Russia's choice of countries is limited: Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and African countries. The first targets for the use of this weapon will be ships and a possible blockade of sea routes.

Why did Nokia lose the mobile device market?

It was destroyed by CEO Stephen Elop, who came from Microsoft. Instead of developing his own operating system, he insisted on purchasing the Windows Phone operating system.

Nokia's weak point was software, but new platforms were supposed to fix this shortcoming. But starting in late 2010, the company's CEO began to slowly and steadily push Nokia in the other direction, towards abandoning its developments. All divisions of RnD and all the developments of the company were destroyed so that the company could no longer return to the right path.

As a result, Microsoft bought Nokia's mobile business.

Killing Nokia. Candid Confession of a Former Company President, Part Three

Killing Nokia. Candid Confession of a Former Company President, continued

Killing Nokia. Frank confession of the former president of the company

Can Putin put an end to the war, as Ukrainian propagandists claim?

At the moment, ending the war on Ukraine's terms is tantamount to losing for Russia, as well as for Ukraine on Russia's terms.

A sustainable end to a conflict usually requires the actions and consent of both sides, and also depends on the situation on the battlefield, the political goals of the parties, and international factors. The thesis that Vladimir Putin can end the war at any moment was especially actively discussed in the period before the elections in Russia. One possible explanation is that after the elections, many expected new decisions to be taken aimed at continuing military operations, including a possible expansion of measures to recruit the armed forces. It was also assumed that with the onset of the autumn-winter period, the conditions of warfare would change: cold weather, rains, fogs and reduced daylight hours could affect the use of certain types of weapons, in particular drones, and tactics of the parties. In addition, it is assumed that the United States will be involved in a major military conflict in another region, and some of the political attention, diplomatic efforts, and military resources may be redistributed. In such a scenario, the war in Ukraine may become less prominent on the international information agenda, and the volume or nature of Western support for Ukraine may change.

There are no signs of a quick political compromise right now. Therefore, many observers consider it more likely that the war will continue in the near future than that it will end quickly.