Will Iran go to war with Israel over the assassination of Haniyeh?

2024-08-03 17:02:29

No, but in the future he will take revenge.

Iran will not let the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, the head of the political bureau of the Palestinian Hamas movement, go unanswered, but will try to ensure that the response does not lead to a large-scale war, because it knows that Britain, Europe and the United States will be on the side of the enemy. Iran will definitely respond, because this is their idea - it is impossible not to respond to the challenge of the enemy.

Iran is not doing anything in a hurry, like the Israelis. Israel does not claim responsibility, and Iran has no concrete evidence.

What is the reason for the start of the war with Iran?

2026-03-08 07:38:27

The struggle for world domination

The primary goal is to destroy stability in the region. The chaos makes the region dependent on an external arbitrator (the United States), without whom local players cannot ensure their safety. The destruction of the digital and logistics hubs of the Persian Gulf undermines the region's status as a secure center of trade and finance. This will lead to an outflow of capital and technology to other regions (Europe, Southeast Asia), which will weaken the economic independence of the Arab monarchies and increase their dependence on the United States. The secondary goal is to slow down China. China is the largest buyer of Iranian oil. Depriving Beijing of this resource or sharply increasing the cost of its delivery due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is hitting Chinese industry. For the United States, weakening the Iran—China link and controlling energy arteries is a strategic priority. However, it is worth considering the risks of such a strategy.: it can rally the opponents of the United States (China, Russia, Iran) into an even closer military-economic bloc and accelerate the process of de-dollarization of the global economy, as countries will see the dollar and the American security system as a direct threat to their existence. The full picture includes: Economics: Saving the dollar and the profits of the military industrial complex. Logistics: Blocking alternative trade routes (Russia-India-China). Technology: Destroying the competitor's potential. Domestic politics: A distraction from the problems in the USA and Israel. The reset of the petrodollar and the preservation of the dollar's hegemony. This is perhaps the most profound economic reason. The bottom line: In recent years, Iran, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries have actively discussed switching to payments for oil in yuan, rubles or local currencies, bypassing the US dollar. This threatened the foundation of the American economy, which is based on the demand for the dollar as a reserve currency.

In his first term, Trump unilaterally tore up the agreement with Iran, but due to the coronavirus, he was unable to carry out the plans to the end.

A potential major war in the Middle East

Why destroy the institution of the family?

2023-04-10 11:20:37

The destruction of the family institution is extremely desirable for those states that gravitate towards totalitarianism (even behind the facade of democracy), since it is impossible to establish complete control over a person without educating him from the very action, with the necessary concepts and attitudes put into his head.

The influence of the state and the political elite, as well as other influential groups, on society is very limited, since each member of society is the bearer of a certain understanding of what is good and bad, how to act right and wrong. And if the attitudes that come from the elites are strikingly different from the understanding of society in a particular issue, then such attitudes will stumble upon strong opposition from the people and for the most part will not be accepted. The only way to carry out any of your decisions without causing public resistance is to learn how to manage public opinion and the norms that are accepted in society. To be able to control a person from his most basic level, it is necessary to control his upbringing from childhood.

The destruction of the family institution is extremely detrimental to the survival of society. Having erased his memory due to the destruction of the mechanism of its transmission from parent to child, society will lose those habits and knowledge that are sometimes not even visible and obvious, but constantly protect society from serious mistakes, which at best can greatly worsen its situation, and in the worst is to put it on the brink of extinction.

The destruction of the family institution: causes and consequences

What should be done to prevent terrorist attacks like the one in Moscow?

2024-03-26 23:29:50

It is necessary to change the ideology

It is not necessary to allow people to do anything for the sake of money or for the sake of religion

We need to pay more attention to solving social problems.