Yes
The modern U.S. military has never faced an adversary even remotely comparable to it in terms of military equipment and resources. Aircraft carriers are formidable weapons, but to ascribe unequivocal military superiority to the United States on the basis of their presence alone is completely wrong.

The U.S. military's most convincing victories have actually been won by CNN and other news corporations.
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
The document where the United States commits to withdraw from NATO by 2027 does not exist. There are strategies and projects where NATO is criticized and viewed as a burden, but this is not a decision to withdraw. The United States will remain in NATO as long as possible.
NATO will remain, but the role of the United States will change . The USA will: 1) maintain the nuclear umbrella and political leadership. NATO is turning from an American army in Europe into a coalition where the United States is the coordinator, not the main performer. 2)) Severe pressure on the allies. This is explicitly stated in the strategies. Tools: the requirement of 2% of GDP for defense, and in fact more, linking American aid to contributions, public pressure, including threats of we don't have to protect you. Europe pays and fights, the United States governs and supports. 3️) Shifting the focus to China 2025-2027 The USA will: build up the fleet and aviation in the Indo-Pacific region, reducing non-binding commitments in Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Philippines are preparing allies. The United States needs Europe as a stable rear, not as the main theater of war. 4) Ukraine is a test model of the future of NATO. The United States tries not to fight directly . Maximum: money, weapon, intelligence service . We arm our allies, we don't fight ourselves.

The US withdrawal from NATO: destroys US influence , frees Europe from dependence , hits the dollar and the military-industrial complex. It is much more profitable to stay , reduce costs , and maintain control . The final formula of the US strategy to remain in NATO, but to make it less American and more European. Maintain leverage without bearing the main burden.
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Yes, the United States said that it did not intend to put up with the current state of affairs in Africa and would send troops. In addition, the African Union, the United States and France supported a military invasion of Niger. The war will be postponed until the U.S. deals with the war in Israel.
There were coups in Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, and Gabon. African countries are simply tired of colonial Europe, which for centuries has used it only as cheap raw materials. The situation in Gabon will be of a special nature, there will be a great struggle for it, because it is a rich and oily country. And because of the coup in Niger, which now does not supply uranium for pennies, the entire nuclear industry in Europe is in danger of disappearing, and these are 56 nuclear power plants in France, 11 in Britain, 7 in Spain, 3 in Germany, 6 in the Czech Republic and about 40 more scattered elsewhere in Europe, according to Politico. So far, the matter is limited only to sanctions. France must withdraw troops by the end of the year.

If ECOWAS does start a war in Africa, then 218,000 bayonets will stand on the side of the West in the countries where it still has influence – the Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde, Liberia, Nigeria, Senegal and Sierra Leone. They will be able to resist the armies of Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso and Guinea - a total of about 30 thousand troops. ECOWAS will make this mistake by carrying out a military intervention in Niger, because if they intervene militarily, it means that the whole of Africa will be at war and the problem is that 80% of the inhabitants in the countries where military coups have taken place support the current military government.
The African Union, the United States and France supported the military invasion of Nigeria
France got into Africa for a lot of money
Generals and colonels are shooting from Africa at France
The new center of power: how the West missed Africa
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
After the loss of the Navy and the loss of the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency.
By 2030, the United States will become the third economy in the world in terms of gross domestic product after China and India. China's dominance in the economic sphere does not in itself weaken the influence of the United States as a power. It is expected that by 2048, the dollar will cease to be the world's leading currency. And the US fleet can only be lost in the event of a protracted war with China and Russia in 2060.

If America faces economic collapse and abandonment of all military and diplomatic obligations, then the rest of the world will be plunged into anarchy, they say - there will be no one to intervene in the friction between South Korea and the DPRK, India and Pakistan, China and its neighbors.
That's the end of it: when will the dollar lose world domination and which currency will replace it
By 2030, the United States will become the third economy in the world in terms of gross domestic product after China and India. China's dominance in the economic sphere does not in itself weaken the influence of the United States as a power. It is expected that by 2048, the dollar will cease to be the world's leading currency. And the US fleet can only be lost in the event of a protracted war with China and Russia in 2060.
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device