What happens if we start regulating AI?

2026-01-02 14:45:25

The Americans are the leaders in AI, and regulation will only increase the technological gap of other countries.

Inequality between countries will lead to the fact that regions with strict regulation may lag behind less regulated ones. This could lead to a war of humans against robots, like in science fiction movies. Governments are trying to regulate AI, relying on experts, business and academia, but the balance of power is unequal: corporations have more resources and influence, independent specialists have less voice. As a result, the rules often reflect not the public interest, but the interests of the strongest players.

The spread of AI is already regulated by American companies that control all key aspects of AI. Video cards, processors, major data centers, scientific developments, etc. are controlled by the Americans.

What will the US achieve with its demands regarding Greenland, Canada, and the like?

2026-02-05 06:12:50

The United States will achieve greater control, access to resources, increased military presence, and political dependence of its allies.

The U.S. will not succeed in annexing Greenland, obtaining territorial concessions from Canada, or achieving a legitimate redrawing of borders, but even without purchasing territory, the U.S. can secure profitable contracts, expanded bases, and exclusive access to natural resources. In the long term, this will lead to a quiet distancing from Washington, an increase in autonomous defense policies in the EU and Canada, as well as a reduced willingness to automatically support the U.S. during crises. In 10-15 years, this could have repercussions in Asia, harm American interests at sea, and weaken the dollar as a 'currency of trust.'

Canada and Denmark are soft allies who publicly express outrage but in practice give way. In doing so, the US itself is pushing the world toward the formula 'Better to have several centers of power than one unpredictable one.'

Western companies have left Russia, will the Russian economy recover?

2025-07-08 12:19:26

No, all conditions have been created for the economic situation in Russia not to improve.

After the withdrawal of Western companies from the Russian market, the Central Bank raised the interest rate, thereby banning the issuance of cheap loans, arguing that the goal is to preserve the savings of Russians. The VAT was also increased, which affected the prices of all goods and services. Additionally, Chinese companies were allowed to enter the market. Furthermore, as a result of the war, Russia may acquire bombed Ukrainian territories that will need to be rebuilt from scratch, which will also impact the economy.

It seems that there are only traitors sitting in the ministries of the country, who do everything the opposite.

Why is there no change for the better in Kazakhstan under the new president?

2023-11-16 09:25:30

Nursultan Nazarbayev is gone, but not to the end

Most appointments are made for authoritarian, clan, and patronage purposes. This means that a certain person is appointed to the post of regional akim or minister, not so much because he is good at what he does and has the right level of professionalism and experience, but because he will definitely do what he is told, what the president ordered him to do. Thus, the ministers became extras who simply supported the main character, the president.

In simple terms, in order to give additional opportunities to someone (for example, small and medium-sized businesses, which are currently being talked about a lot), you need to take these opportunities away from those who use them incorrectly or incorrectly. And this already smacks of a redistribution of power. That is, in fact, there is a question of reducing the caste of untouchables and the resources controlled by it.

New Kazakhstan