In practice, large-scale purchases of GPUs and memory, buying up the best AI labs, and poaching top researchers are a powerful tool for eliminating competitors, especially small and medium-sized players.
In part, this destruction of competitors is not direct, but through economic and technological strangulation. OpenAI and Microsoft do not have to want to harm others - it is enough for them to maximize their progress, and the market itself will exclude the weak. The goal is that the future of AI is determined by 2-3 corporations, not a community of scientists, startups and public organizations.

The main threat is not from AI as a technology, but from the one who owns it.
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Positioning AI as a threat allows you to increase sales and accelerate the adoption of AI, despite any prohibitions.
If the same phenomenon is presented to a person as a threat or as an opportunity, the threat causes a more intense and energetic reaction. When visionary leaders and technologists notice a disruptive process, they warn of an impending threat: the company may die if the technology brings success to its competitors. The threat must be eliminated: the company must implement the technology itself and allocate resources for its development or purchase.

It is necessary to convince top management to take the problem seriously, and for this it is necessary to present innovative technology as a threat in the resource allocation planning process. Then responsibility for the implementation of the project must be transferred to an outside, autonomous organizational unit, which will perceive it solely as an opportunity. This is exactly what marketing departments and the media are doing now, namely positioning AI as a threat and later as a solution.
The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth
Can Competing Frames Co-exist? The Paradox of Threatened Response
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Le Pen in 2027
The current president cannot run because he has been president twice.

Most likely, a person from a different party than Macron will be chosen, since his rule was marked by a lot of unrest in the country, as well as by making extremely unprofitable decisions for the people of France.
President of France
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Muslims and Jews have a religious ban on eating pork. Both religions were formed in hot countries, where such perishable and dirty meat as pork is dangerous for human health.
It is known that pigs are omnivorous - they are able to digest everything they find: from carrion to their own excrement. The animals themselves do not suffer from this, but for humans, the toxins accumulating in pork are a real poison. The sages of the past came up with the idea that it is much easier and faster to convince your loved ones that a pig is almost a fiend of hell than to explain that this meat can be dangerous to health. There is another reason - pig farming requires a lot of fresh water, and the Middle East is an arid place. Breeding pigs turns out to be unprofitable.

But initially, God's instructions about food did not contain any prohibitions. Everything that moves that lives will be your food
Why don't Jews and Muslims eat pork, but Christians do?
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Scan QR code to get a link to APK file