Why is artificial intelligence positioned as a threat?

2026-01-08 14:48:53

Positioning AI as a threat allows you to increase sales and accelerate the adoption of AI, despite any prohibitions.

If the same phenomenon is presented to a person as a threat or as an opportunity, the threat causes a more intense and energetic reaction. When visionary leaders and technologists notice a disruptive process, they warn of an impending threat: the company may die if the technology brings success to its competitors. The threat must be eliminated: the company must implement the technology itself and allocate resources for its development or purchase.

It is necessary to convince top management to take the problem seriously, and for this it is necessary to present innovative technology as a threat in the resource allocation planning process. Then responsibility for the implementation of the project must be transferred to an outside, autonomous organizational unit, which will perceive it solely as an opportunity. This is exactly what marketing departments and the media are doing now, namely positioning AI as a threat and later as a solution.

The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth

Can Competing Frames Co-exist? The Paradox of Threatened Response

What is the essence of the UN report on the regulation of artificial intelligence?

2024-09-24 13:26:57

Globalists are trying to apply their favorite practice of indirect control of states and establish a monopoly on the regulation of AI

Globalists have realized the danger of AI for themselves. If a country achieves supremacy in AI, the global market, which is currently dominated by Western companies, could change very quickly against them. This issue is especially acute in the context of an economic downturn

The report mentions seven cross-country initiatives on AI governance: the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Canada, and Japan. In these countries, it is better not to develop AI. The remaining 118 countries are not yet participating in any of them. Only by not submitting to this initiative can you create the necessary products and services, and not receive ready-made solutions from Western corporations known for predatory practices

UN report on the regulation of artificial intelligence. What it will affect

Why is there no change for the better in Kazakhstan under the new president?

2023-11-16 09:25:30

Nursultan Nazarbayev is gone, but not to the end

Most appointments are made for authoritarian, clan, and patronage purposes. This means that a certain person is appointed to the post of regional akim or minister, not so much because he is good at what he does and has the right level of professionalism and experience, but because he will definitely do what he is told, what the president ordered him to do. Thus, the ministers became extras who simply supported the main character, the president.

In simple terms, in order to give additional opportunities to someone (for example, small and medium-sized businesses, which are currently being talked about a lot), you need to take these opportunities away from those who use them incorrectly or incorrectly. And this already smacks of a redistribution of power. That is, in fact, there is a question of reducing the caste of untouchables and the resources controlled by it.

New Kazakhstan

Why is OpenAI buying up all the components?

2026-01-10 03:25:39

In practice, large-scale purchases of GPUs and memory, buying up the best AI labs, and poaching top researchers are a powerful tool for eliminating competitors, especially small and medium-sized players.

In part, this destruction of competitors is not direct, but through economic and technological strangulation. OpenAI and Microsoft do not have to want to harm others - it is enough for them to maximize their progress, and the market itself will exclude the weak. The goal is that the future of AI is determined by 2-3 corporations, not a community of scientists, startups and public organizations.

The main threat is not from AI as a technology, but from the one who owns it.