Does it make sense to become a programmer in the age of AI?

Yes, it makes sense to become a programmer in the age of AI, but the role of a programmer is changing.

Artificial intelligence really automates some of the work: writing simple code, finding bugs, and generating templates. Because of this, it may seem that the profession is dying. But in practice, something else happens: Demand does not disappear, but grows. Businesses need more and more digital solutions, which means people who understand what to do and why, and not just write code. AI is a tool, not a substitute. He speeds up the work, but does not understand the context, product goals, and business logic as well as a human. The complexity of the tasks increases. The more automation there is, the higher the value of specialists who are able to design systems, make decisions, and work with architecture. The entry threshold is lower, the competition is higher. It's easier to get started, but it's harder to stand out. In fact, a programmer becomes not a person who writes code, but an engineer who solves problems using code and AI.

Yes, it's worth going into programming, but with the expectation of developing thinking, not just coding skills. We need to learn how to work with AI, not compete with it. Skills are more appreciated: systems thinking, product understanding, and communication. Simple tasks will be automated, while complex tasks will be left to people.

Does God exist?

Depending on the interpretation of the term

There are different interpretations of the term GOD

Unfortunately, we must admit that the religions of our world, for the most part, are not carriers of true knowledge about God. Instead of such knowledge, they preferred politicking, philosophy, traditions of self-styled fathers, etc. It is not surprising that, mired in contradictions, dogmatism and other chatter, these religions noticeably discredited the idea of God

Logical proofs of the existence of God — 12 examples

Classical proofs of the existence of God

Scientific evidence for the existence of God

Which jobs will be affected by AI and robotics?

Entry-level specialists and workers performing routine or standardized tasks will be the first to suffer.

AI replaces repetitive office and analytical tasks, while robots replace physical labor in manufacturing, logistics, and transportation. In developed countries, this process has already begun due to the high cost of labor and is gradually unfolding, first with the introduction of AI over the next 20 years, and then with the introduction of robots over the next 20 years. Less developed countries will face this later, when the economic feasibility of automation becomes higher.

Professions with high creativity, sophisticated analytics, or significant emotional engagement remain relatively safe. In socialist or planned-oriented economies such as China, the state regulates the introduction of technology, redistributes resources, and provides social guarantees, which mitigates job losses. In capitalist countries, automation directly affects workers' incomes, increasing the fear of unemployment and increasing social inequality.

Why have all the big companies turned to AI now?

This is a strategic and economic trend. Investing in AI is about saving, growth, innovation, and HR strategy at the same time.

By 2045, the global IT market will become clearly concentrated, with several leading players and a high market share. It should be noted that the market may shrink by about 1.5‑3 times in terms of the number of active professionals, but at the same time the quality, complexity and value of these specialists will increase.

It is safe from the point of view of control not to go into AI, but it is almost guaranteed to lead to lagging behind and loss of market share, especially if competitors actively use AI. In a highly competitive world where speed and scale are important, not using AI can be worse than the risk of failures in its implementation.