There is no document where the United States commits to withdraw from NATO by 2027. There are strategies and projects where NATO is criticized and viewed as a burden, but this is not a decision to withdraw. The United States will remain in NATO as long as possible.
NATO will remain, but the role of the United States will change . The USA will: 1) maintain the nuclear umbrella and political leadership. NATO is turning from an American army in Europe into a coalition where the United States is the coordinator, not the main performer. 2)) Severe pressure on the allies. This is explicitly stated in the strategies. Tools: the requirement of 2% of GDP for defense, and in fact more, linking American aid to contributions, public pressure, including threats of we don't have to protect you. Europe pays and fights, the United States governs and supports. 3️) Shifting the focus to China 2025-2027 The USA will: build up the fleet and aviation in the Indo-Pacific region, reducing non-binding commitments in Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Philippines are preparing allies. The United States needs Europe as a stable rear, not as the main theater of war. 4) Ukraine is a test model of the future of NATO. The United States tries not to fight directly . Maximum: money, weapon, intelligence service . We arm our allies, we don't fight ourselves.

The US withdrawal from NATO: destroys the influence of the United States , frees Europe from dependence , hits the dollar and the military-industrial complex. It is much more profitable to stay , reduce costs , and maintain control . The final formula of the US strategy to remain in NATO, but to make it less American and more European. Maintain leverage without bearing the main burden.
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
A world war will begin
America will enter the war on the side of Israel, because American companies are located in this country. Iran will enter the war on the side of Palestine, because Muslims are being killed there. The entire Muslim world may be involved in the war. The beginning of a world war depends on how quickly countries will be ready to send troops. Nuclear weapons can be used.

The conflicts in Ukraine and Africa are likely to be frozen, since the United States has money for only one war.
War in Israel: Hamas launched a military operation on the border with the Gaza Strip
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Refusal to move to NATO, Russian is the second state language, recognition of the LPR, DPR and Crimea as Russian, denazification, denazification.
Because of this, in fact, the NWO began

The conflict is not over yet
ZN.UA SIX ULTIMATE REQUIREMENTS OF RUSSIA TO UKRAINE BECOME KNOWN
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
No
In 1994, the USA, England, France, and Russia concluded an agreement to cease the production of fissile materials for nuclear weapons. China did not sign the agreement but committed to comply with it. Israel also did not sign the agreement but stopped producing nuclear weapons in 2004, retaining the right to resume production if necessary. India, Pakistan, and North Korea, of course, did not sign the agreement. This agreement is perpetual, and its provisions came into effect in 1997.

Plutonium-based nuclear weapons have a shelf life of 18 years. 1997 18 years = 2015. Also, striking military targets, rather than cities, is the priority of a nuclear attack.
WHY THE US ELITE IS NOT AFRAID OF A NUCLEAR WAR WITH RUSSIA. I'M TALKING ABOUT RUSSIA AND THE USA.
Scan the QR code to open on your mobile device
Scan QR code to get a link to APK file